The New Economics Of Trade Agreements From Trade Liberalization To Regulatory Convergence

So what is the appropriate compromise in international trade agreements between heterogeneous tastes across international borders and the costs imposed by different rules? Bown, C P and M A Crowley (2016), “The empirical landscape of trade policy”, In K Bagwell and R W Staiger (Eds) The Handbook of Commercial Policy 1A, North Holland. Consider as a point of reference a free trade agreement that limits tariffs to zero and requires domestic treatment for consumer subsidies, but which leaves governments free to choose their domestic policy3. Each government leaves its local companies free from regulation, but imposes import charges to “transfer” companies from the foreign market to the domestic market. This confirms Sykes` (1999b) intuition that regulatory cooperation may be necessary when governments are limited in the use of their privileged protectionist instruments.4 To address this issue, we consider in Grossman et al. (2019) an environment where people residing in different countries have different assessments of the characteristics of goods and services reflecting idiosyncratic local conditions. Histories and cultures or what Lamy (2016) calls “collective preferences.” To address North-North regulatory convergence issues in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and other regional negotiations, we are considering horizontal product standards. These standards for product attributes are objectively neither better nor worse, but only different, and these different attributes are evaluated differently from one country to another. Horizontal product standards reflect the types of issues that are at the heart of the negotiations on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, such as the harmonisation of standards for shock absorbers and wiper/debacle systems in the automotive sector, veterinary medicinal products and utility additives banned in the processed food sector and data protection. to name but a few.1 The model includes shipping costs that have an impact on the domestic market.

As a result, firms sell relatively more in their local market than in their export market. This has an impact on their optimal design choices, as the most profitable companies are particularly interested in local tastes due to the relative importance of this market for their end result. And given the additional costs associated with the development of secondary products different from the basic products sold on the national territory, it is both profitable and efficient for companies to sell on their export market products further from the offshore ideal than those offered there by local companies. While local governments may not care about the profits of foreign producers, they do care about the prices and diversity of goods available to their voters. . . .

Comments are closed.